User blog comment:Alchimous/Page policy/@comment-4536066-20121025034627/@comment-5049048-20121025184441

Dion, I laughed.

---

"If the admins are unable to control there human emotions, they should not be admins."

-''Have you always controlled your human emotions? No? That's what I thought. If you keep arguing about the same thing, with mostly the same argument (Which was pretty much what I saw so far), I can understand Teh Alch's discontent.''

"Admins are human you are correct, but humans realize there mistakes and apoligize. No such apology has been submitted."

''Yes, it is good form to apologize for making a mistake. I would make an exception for someone who is driving me crazy with a kind of logic that keeps repeating itself, with arguments that are mostly empty. Also, I cannot submit an apology on Teh Alch's behalf.''

"Queen,

The problem isn't having disagreeing opinions. The problem is the exploitation of power in banning someone, for only having a disagreeing opinion."

''-Yes, explotitation of power isn't great. See my two above points for references that I believe may have lead to the banning you speak of.''

"Debating lore is a large part of roleplaying. However deleting a person's points and banning them for debating their side is blatantly wrong."

''-From what I have seen (And this may be horribly wrong, as I haven't seen most of the debate), the debate is fairly repetitive, and one-sided. I do believe in deleting excess repetition.''