User blog comment:Natalie Renderra/Gods on the Alignment Axis./@comment-4536066-20130719174300

I would position Bandos as chaotic evil - he wages violent war blindly and stupidly and without any real aim except for the shits and giggles of waging war. He doesn't care about rules, has no empathy for any sentient life, enjoys the sufferings of battle, and would be pretty useless if expected to work as part of a team.

Sliske is more of a chaotic neutral, imo. He's big on freedom and individuality, but specifically his own freedom and individuality. I mean, look at the Barrows brothers, he clearly isn't very concerned about whether or not others have that freedom. He does pretty much everything for himself, whether it's good for anybody else or not, and is very Jack Sparrow in how you can rely on him to pretty much always be dishonest or have some second layer of manipulative plot going on underneath everything.

I may even go so far as to suggest that Zamorak has "morally good" leanings. "Chaotic good" characters generally value progress, change, individuality, and creativity, but unlike neutrals, they want it for others as well as just themselves. They try to spread the benefits of chaos and speak out for individual strength, or resent ordered regimes that suppress those freedoms. Sounds a lot like Zamorak. Really, the only damper on Zamorak's "good" alignment is that he doesn't seem to put any value on sentient life.