Talk:Natalie Renderra/@comment-25345260-20130228023432/@comment-1510327-20130228033249

Dear sir or madam (whichever applies), your portrayal of the word "group" in this article was indeed worthy of being editted, as it postulated an incorrect implication that the group in question warranted a capital "G" in the word "group", when in fact it was referring to a collective group of Saradominists with no official alias containing the word "group" therein.

I have also corrected your portrayal of the word "Saradomin" to "Saradominist" so it is consistent with the word which follows it -which, by mere coincidence, is the same word I corrected above- in that "Saradomin group" would be more consistent with its Germanic origins if it were portrayed as "Saradominist group", unless of course, it was the official title of such an organization such as That Saradomin Group, in which case none of what I just said would apply.

As such, I have taken the liberty to correct these grievous mistakes in an attempt to make your article a thorough representation of the subject you seemingly wished to cover when you wrote it.

Regards,

Dion Magnan