Talk:Wiseroot/@comment-5440430-20140509033833/@comment-4536066-20140509034902

maybe the implication is that there are lawful tendencies.

I guess the thing that would decide if he's ethically lawful or neutral would be how seriously he takes his percieved duty. If he's genuinely committed to it, that would probably plant him in lawful territory, but if it's more like "in general I tend to do this, but it's not that important," that's pretty neutral.