Talk:Justice Icriulis/@comment-27642696-20140413090147/@comment-4547854-20140413213508

Actually, Durdan, that would be incorrect. John is the respective owner of this article, as he's put the most amount of effort into the article and its content, and this is his character. Crow is able to go and revise the article in terms of grammar and spelling, yes, however I think Crow wants to reword a lot of the content to a point that John may not like. If John doesn't like Crow's revisions, then he has the right to go and undo his edit, as Crow is a different party to the article and John has full rights to what goes onto the page. If vandalism were to be brought in, then the only person who could possibly vandalize the page is Crow. Otherwise, it's just another one of John's edits.