Talk:Ranks and Titles/@comment-5532691-20140903224554/@comment-4536066-20140904002828

I definitely think they would be inappropriate on History-Of articles, considering that those are guides to historical roleplay events, not guides to the city structures by lore. (Note: I recognize that there are exceptions to this, particularly where the presence or change of culture and social structures is a relevant element of the play history, but that's not what we're talking about here.)

It wouldn't work on the Humans guide, either, primarily because there is no universal or nearly-universal ranking system for all of human culture like there is among demon, vampyre, or aviansie culture. That said, it would work to put subgroup-specific ranking sections into guides for primarily-human factions of people that have clearly delineated, hierarchical ranks. The White Knights guide is a good example of a guide article that (mostly) refers to humans and could potentially host a subsection about a canon ranking system.

That said, if the editing community did elect to include rankings on separate, group-specific guides, then I would also support the addition of links in the "See Also" section of this page that could direct people easily to those sections (EG, Vampyres#Social_Ranking_Hierarchy).