Talk:Mahjarrat/@comment-4537109-20111102065344/@comment-98.230.35.221-20111102133253

Rather than deleting that possible interpretation of the gem, why don't you list the function that you think it could hold alongside the other function? All of that is in a section of the page that explicitly states it's not written in stone and some of the contents are largely based on speculation. This seems like a scenario where adding more information would be more beneficial than adding less.

The information about Zaros should go in an article about Zaros, btw. I don't know if you were meaning to put it in the Mahj article, but I figured it should have a preemptive strike if you were.