Talk:Logan Stasov/@comment-20355458-20150816092833/@comment-4547854-20150922221752

@Lor, I wouldn't be surprised if it's changed by now, especially since that screenshot is an edit from 2011. It was just a little note that was kind've interesting and just incase things didn't change.

and @Morning, I understand that IC, your character is known by that title. But, we're OOC here. Regardless on the context of the title, it's just more professional to have the characters name itself as the title and have their title in the content of the article. Quite a few of us have sections for our characters where their titles, honors and such are listed in those sections, but our pages still have that characters name for the title of the page itself. But about the topic of despite what kingdom he serves and his origins, the title would change if he should choose to become a Knight of another Kingdom. Should he become a Knight of Varrock, he would be "Knight Logan of Varrock," despite his origins in Falador. It would be awkward for a Knight of Varrock to carry a title of Falador despite his allegiance stating otherwise. That's really why we make sections for our titles, because should they begin to change or gain more titles(Knight of Varrock, King of Ardougne and Emperor of Asgarnia all in one shot, we'll say), it's going to get really. Really. REALLY. Confusing.

Not sure if it's still proper to call him a Knight even more, either. He's also a Captain, so he'd be properly referred to as Captain Logan of the Asgarnian Military. Already the situation is confusing by reading the page and seeing different ranks, hence why section dedicated to such would be useful here.