Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4530750-20160228040801/@comment-4530750-20160303113524

It isn't your wiki. It isn't my wiki. It isn't Jim's wiki. It's the community's wiki.

You've been absent from the administration for quite some time and have manifested in the past that you did not want anything further to do with it, or the wiki. Had you been in our skype chat or in touch with us in any way, you would have had the opportunity to participate in the discussion that we had about it. It just didn't feel like you cared.

Moreover, there's no sense in trying to guilt anybody with personal commentary along the lines of "I am extremely disappointed that m wiki...", nor is it needed. It adds nothing constructive or intelligent to the discussion at hand.

As for the pages belonging to people that have acted improperly in the past, that has also been discussed briefly at the top of the thread. Is it something that people want? Is it something that they consider legitimate? Is the wiki a 'safe place' or an open, accessible one to all? Is it something that should even be broached upon here? Should we even delete pages belonging to people that have been found to be guilty of some sort of Very Bad Thing™? Where is the line drawn for those things? A lot of what you mention in your post has already been addressed in some fashion by posts already found in the thread.

For those of you that are curious, page deletion won with a total of six votes, winning meagerly over the other proposed options. Attached pages such as character articles will not be removed and TSG will not be erased from the other pages, though dead links directing to the TSG page are subject to removal due to housekeeping.