Talk:Kinshra/@comment-1510327-20130202123426/@comment-5051341-20130413174110

"The Kinshra raid farming communities, killing innocents in the process.

The White Knights are against the unlawful actions of The Kinshra.

Bearing this in mind, there is no way The Kinshra can be the

"good guys" in this allegorical rivalry. I'm not defending the

White Knights though. They've done questionable things."

They only did that under Sulla because they were being persecuted by the White Knights. The White Knights are dishonourable and use the guise of Saradominism to achieve popularity and let their dark side go unquestioned. They are deceitful and devious.

The Kinshra are, in general, honourable. They have a dark side; everyone does. Under Sulla they unleashed their anger upon Asgarnia - Asgarnia, which they had helped build, has turned its back on them in favour of the White Knights, who are the most likely culprits of Vallance's disappearence and who used the Kinshra's support until they didn't need it, and then cast the Kinshra out.

I am not saying the Kinshra are the "good guys", but I am saying that the White Knights, in no way, are the "good guys". In my interpretation of lore and events within it, the Kinshra, for me, are the most likely to be the "good guys". But I don't think there are any good guys, not anymore. Since the day Vallance disappeared and the White Knights took control of Asgarnia, the good guys disappeared. The White Knights showed their true colours to anyone who looks close enough, and the Kinshra lost all want to be the good guys. Now it's just a power struggle between two groups who hate each others guts, and will do anything to destroy the other.