Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-4536066-20140428041456/@comment-209.51.184.30-20140430235916

K9 Morphed wrote: I lied, I thought of another three:

1 - When people landscale land that isn't already being inhabited by a RP group to use the land as it's designed to be used in-lore. Seriously, please don't just landscale it because it's not where you want it to be. Landscaling is ew most of the time. EG - Landscaling an uninhabited Kingdom to make a Kingdom RP. :|

2 - Landscaling a house where there is a lot more available. Landscaling makes general RP complicated, especially if it's something like a house. I have a pet peave of people making incomplete lists. ;)

As somone who landscales a lot of land my main justification is that I do it for the sake of simplicity. If I'm landscaling a house it gets rid of the chance that there's a later argument over who was in it first. Houses I try to at the least landscale into the same kingdom/city just because it makes more sense, but most of the houses I landscale are the larger buildings.

As far as the first one goes I think you mean like a Kinshra group landscaling the fortress to Kandarin? I've got mixed feelings on that. If it's a kinshra group that is actually in kandarin and needs to be in it for it's story then it makes sense to landscale it but if it's like a kinshra group landscaling it to south of falador then yeah that's pointless. Idk i've got mixed feelings on landscaling, as someone who does it way too much I like it, it avoids conflict and lets people who want to use the land for the lore it offers to use it but I get the annoyance when a group doing like city rp landscales lumbridge, I can see that being frusturating when the rp could jsut as easily be one in lumbridge.

Magus